What began as a racist campaign theme has now been condoned by a Supreme Court with Donald Trump appointee voting with the majority.
SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRUMP TRAVEL BAN. Wow!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 26, 2018
“The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld President Donald Trump’s ban on travel from several mostly Muslim countries, rejecting a challenge that it discriminated against Muslims or exceeded his authority.
The 5-4 decision Tuesday is the court’s first substantive ruling on a Trump administration policy.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, joined by his four conservative colleagues.
Roberts wrote that presidents have substantial power to regulate immigration. He also rejected the challengers’ claim of anti-Muslim bias.”
While seven countries are impacted by this. Many are pointing out that Trump once called it a Muslim ban and that it still appears to be one. The Wall Street Journal reports:
“States, immigrant- and civil-rights groups and individual U.S. residents have challenged the ban, arguing it was inspired by Muslim animus, tracing back to Mr. Trump’s call as a presidential candidate for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.” They say the U.S. already had sufficient screening practices in place without Mr. Trump’s restrictions.”
BREAKING: SCOTUS has upheld Trump’s Muslim ban. This is not the first time the Court has been wrong, or has allowed official racism and xenophobia to continue rather than standing up to it.
History has its eyes on us — and will judge today’s decision harshly. #NoMuslimBanEver
— ACLU (@ACLU) June 26, 2018
"Travel ban" is a euphemism. Trump repeatedly called it what it is: a Muslim ban.
— Ken Klippenstein (@kenklippenstein) June 26, 2018
In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor seems to agree.
Justice Sotomayor's dissent in Trump v. Hawaii: Trump's travel ban was "first advertised openly and unequivocally as a 'total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States' and now "masquerades behind a façade of national-security concerns." https://t.co/66jlvSaegq pic.twitter.com/k8AzCjtNcF
— Keith Boykin (@keithboykin) June 26, 2018
One of the ban’s most outspoken critics, Rep. Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to Congress is expressing outrage over what he calls a partisan court decision.
SCOTUS upholding Muslim/Travel ban is reminiscent of Taney Court’s Dred Scott decision, in which an partisan court reached a discriminatory holding to support a futile attempt at suppressing human dignity. The dustbin of history awaits this one too. https://t.co/FVSYJbbFVw
— Keith Ellison (@keithellison) June 26, 2018
It’s also important to read what Justice Kennedy wrote about Trump and his tweeting:
How would a lower court even interpret this? Kennedy (suggests): 1) We have no Constitutional right to stop Trump from Tweeting/saying certain things 2) Trump has no Constitutional license to Tweet/say prejudicial counter-Constitutional stuff… https://t.co/M2Fnm0Frjq
— Glenn Thrush (@GlennThrush) June 26, 2018
The effect of Trump’s appointment of Neil Gorsuch is being profoundly felt on the Supreme Court.
As one after another 5-4 rulings of this SCOTUS on voting rights, abortion rights, the travel ban and more are announced, the full meaning of @SenMajLdr ‘s unconscionable, nearly year- long blockade against the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland is manifest.
— David Axelrod (@davidaxelrod) June 26, 2018