The Implications Of The Korean Peace Overtures

Welcome

PANMUNJOM, SOUTH KOREA - APRIL 27: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un (L) and South Korean President Moon Jae-in (R) cross back the military demarcation line to the south side after Moon crossing the border to north upon meeting for the Inter-Korean Summit April 27, 2018 in Panmunjom, South Korea. Kim and Moon meet at the border today for the third-ever inter-Korean summit talks after the 1945 division of the peninsula, and first since 2007 between then President Roh Moo-hyun of South Korea and Leader Kim Jong-il of North Korea. (Photo by Korea Summit Press Pool/Getty Images)

To see the leaders of the two Koreas meeting at the DMZ is nothing short of remarkable, a photo-op for the ages.  But what does it mean for the peninsula and what are the true motives of the North?   Yesterday, Kim Jong-un crossed the heavily armed border into South Korea to meet with president Moon Jae-in and discuss a what is being called a landmark peace accord between the two enemy nations.

The Washington Post reports:

While most politicians and analysts in Washington and Seoul were pleasantly surprised, many questions remain. According to vox.com’s Alex Ward,  “Diplomacy with North Korea is hard for one simple reason: Pyongyang promises a lot but then doesn’t follow through.”

Kim seemed aware of his country’s problems with backing away from diplomatic solutions like this.

“The expectations are high and we have learned a lesson from previous times and even if we have good agreements and implementations don’t follow, they will disappoint people who had high expectations,” he stated to Moon.

Another concerning issue is denuclearization. The Post says that the wording on the document, “through complete denuclearization,” raises the possibility that South Korea would not be allowed any nuclear weapons along with the North. Since the U.S government regularly sends these weapons to the South during their military exercises, this is a major aspect of U.S-South Korea relations. It appears that the North might subtly try to change the nature of that alliance.

However, Axios cautions that both North and South Korea might want to cut the U.S out of the equation completely. “If an agreement ultimately means no need for the United States…the peninsula tilts away from security and towards economics.”

It also opens up the possibility that China might try to swoop in and assert control over the whole Korean affair.  And remember, the two Koreas have been talking, off and on since 1972.