Dan Rather: On The First Half of Mueller Day

Welcome

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 24: Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller testifies before the House Judiciary Committee about his report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election in the Rayburn House Office Building July 24, 2019 in Washington, DC. Mueller, along with former Deputy Special Counsel Aaron Zebley, will later testify before the House Intelligence Committee in back-to-back hearings on Capitol Hill. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

With a stream of mostly “Yes” and “No”  “Yup” and “Nope” style answers, Robert Mueller got through the first half of his day in the hot seat by confirming what is in his written report.

No, he did not—as the President has claimed—“completely exonerate” Mr. Trump.  No, he did not conclude that there was no obstruction of justice (neither will he say that Mr Trump did do it.)  And, no, he did not say that there was no “collusion” with the Russians; he does say that he could prove no outright “conspiracy.”

Mueller leaves it murky, to say the least, as to what he really thinks.  Prosecutors are supposed to find facts, apply the law and solve cases—reach conclusions.  For whatever reasons, Mueller chose not to completely carry through on all of that when it applies to  the President.  To say this is not to state or imply criticism.  It is to try to analyze where we are now, with what are we left? The answer is “the report,” and whatever if anything Congress intends to do with  and about it.

Republican’s spent most of their time criticizing Mueller, his actions and his motives.  Democrats heavily praised him and spent a lot of time reading from the report.  Whether any of it changed many opinions about the President and what he has and hasn’t done is debatable.

Mueller—already a Marine war hero—had a chance today to play a hero’s role of a difference sort, for one side or the other.  He declined, saying in effect, that he isn’t going to carry water for any political side.
He leaves himself and his report for history to judge.